Metodologías activas con IA generativa y aprendizaje significativo: una revisión sistemática

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23221171

Palabras clave:

Metodologías con IA, aprendizaje significativo, revisión sistemática

Resumen

La incorporación de inteligencia artificial generativa en la educación superior abrió nuevas posibilidades para desarrollar metodologías activas, aunque su contribución al aprendizaje significativo requirió un examen más preciso. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo realizar una revisión sistemática y bibliometría de la producción científica sobre metodologías activas potenciadas por inteligencia artificial generativa y su relación con el aprendizaje significativo en el ámbito universitario. Se desarrolló un estudio documental analítico conceptual y cuantitativo. La búsqueda se realizó entre febrero y mayo de 2026 en Scopus, Web of Science y SciELO, y consideró publicaciones aparecidas desde 2017 hasta mayo de 2026. Se siguieron las directrices PRISMA 2020 para documentar la identificación y selección de los estudios. El análisis bibliométrico examinó la evolución temporal de las publicaciones, la afiliación del primer autor y las revistas científicas; la lectura de los artículos permitió caracterizar las estrategias pedagógicas y los resultados de aprendizaje abordados. Se observó una mayor concentración de publicaciones en 2024, así como una distribución de los trabajos entre instituciones de diferentes contextos geográficos y revistas especializadas en educación y tecnología. Los estudios examinaron usos de la inteligencia artificial generativa en tutorías, actividades colaborativas y procesos de retroalimentación, pero emplearon criterios distintos para valorar el aprendizaje. Se concluyó que su integración en metodologías activas ofreció oportunidades para enriquecer las experiencias universitarias; sin embargo, la participación o el rendimiento no demostraron por sí solos un aprendizaje significativo.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Bai, H., Lui, W. C., & Khiatani, P. V. (2025). Promoting student engagement with GPTutor: An intelligent tutoring system powered by generative AI. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00571-9

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Brassler, M., & Dettmers, J. (2017). How to enhance interdisciplinary competence—Interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1686

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field. TechTrends, 68, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0

Dai, K., Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2026). Generative AI in higher education: A bibliometric review of emerging trends, power dynamics, and global research landscapes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10, Article 100544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100544

Ding, L., O’Berry, R., Tallent, H., Gharti Chhetri G C, S., & Gapud, A. (2026). Learning with large language models: Beyond prompt engineering. Education and Information Technologies, 31, 2877–2901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13924-2

Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., & Amankwa, J. O. (2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198

Gao, Z. Y., Cheah, J. H., Lim, X. J., & Luo, X. (2024). Enhancing the academic performance of business students using generative AI: An interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(2), Article 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958

Groothuijsen, S., van den Beemt, A., Remmers, J. C., & van Meeuwen, L. W. (2024). AI chatbots in programming education: Students’ use in a scientific computing course and consequences for learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100290

Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024). Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students’ feedback quality and writing ability. The Internet and Higher Education, 63, Article 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

Huang, H., Liu, Y., Dong, M., & Lu, C. (2024). Integrating AIGC into product design ideation teaching: An empirical study on self-efficacy and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 92, Article 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101929

Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225

Lachheb, A., Leung, J., Abramenka-Lachheb, V., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2025). AI in higher education: A bibliometric analysis, synthesis, and a critique of research. The Internet and Higher Education, 67, Article 101021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101021

Luo, J., Zheng, C., Yin, J., & Teo, H. H. (2025). Design and assessment of AI-based learning tools in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00540-2

Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human–AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, Article 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

Pallant, J. L., Blijlevens, J., Campbell, A., & Jopp, R. (2026). Mastering knowledge: The impact of generative AI on student learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 51(4), 714–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2487570

Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field. TechTrends, 69, 1105–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1

Wei, X., Wang, L., Lee, L.-K., & Liu, R. (2025). The effects of generative AI on collaborative problem-solving and team creativity performance in digital story creation: An experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00526-0

Weng, X., Xia, Q., Gu, M., Rajaram, K., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Assessment and learning outcomes for generative AI in higher education: A scoping review on current research status and trends. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9540

Xie, Z. H., Wu, X. Z., & Xie, Y. X. (2024). Can interaction with generative artificial intelligence enhance learning autonomy? A longitudinal study from comparative perspectives of virtual companionship and knowledge acquisition preferences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12863

Yang, Y., Luo, J., Yang, M., Yang, R., & Chen, J. (2024). From surface to deep learning approaches with generative AI in higher education: An analytical framework of student agency. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2327003

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Descargas

Publicado

2026-10-06

Número

Sección

Comunicación de la ciencia: Bibliometría y revisiones sistemáticas

Cómo citar

Carranza Liza , M. R., Beltrán Canaría, W. A., Carrillo Valverde, M. E., & Feijoo-Parra, M. F. O. (2026). Metodologías activas con IA generativa y aprendizaje significativo: una revisión sistemática. Revista InveCom / ISSN en línea: 2739-0063, 6(Especial 2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23221171

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a