Construction and validation of a coercive micromachismo scale (MMC-18) in a population of university adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13760544Keywords:
micromachismo, instrument, validityAbstract
The objective of the present study was based on designing and validating the psychometric properties of a scale that measures coercive micromachismo in university adults, with the purpose of identifying specific elements for intervention and prevention measures. Methodologically, an instrumental quantitative approach was followed, considering 526 adult students from a Peruvian public university (257 women and 269 men) as a non-probabilistic study sample. To validate the scale, a discriminative analysis of the items was developed in order to obtain the reliability and factorial structure, while the construct validity was addressed from the exploratory factorial analysis, evidencing an adequate sample of indicators by presenting a KMO index. =.9484 and a statistically significant p-value (P<.05) in the Bartlet test. In its final version, the scale has 18 items distributed in two factors: subordination and stereotypes. The grading process showed evidence of non-linearity with percentiles and the scale reached a reliability level of α = 0.93, therefore it is concluded that the scale has the validity and reliability properties to accurately measure coercive micromachismo.
Downloads
References
Bonino, L., & Szil, P. (2006). Everyday male chauvinism intimate partner violence which is not called violence. 47. www.stop-ferfieroszak.hu
Bonino Méndez, L. (1991). MICROMACHISMOS: LA VIOLENCIA INVISIBLE EN LA PAREJA. In Micromachismos: La violencia invisible en la pareja.
Čekrlija, Đ., Rokvić, N. M., Dinić, B. M., & Schermer, J. A. (2023). Relationship between the inferiority and superiority complex and the Big Five and Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 206, 112123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2023.112123
Cruz, S. (2014). Violencia y jóvenes: Pandilla e identidad masculina en Ciudad Juárez. Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, 76(4), 613–637. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rms/v76n4/v76n4a4.pdf
Edo, A. (2017). Estudio comparativo de códigos deontológicos sobre violencia de género ycomunicación. Bases para un manual de estilo fundamental. La Desigualdad de Género Invisibilizada En La Comunicación, March, 5–19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339738660
Ferrer Pérez, V. A., Fiol, E. B., Guzmán, C. N., Palmer, M. C. R., & Buades, M. E. G. (2008). Los micromachismos o microviolencias en la relación de pareja: Una aproximación empírica. Anales de Psicologia, 24(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.6018/ANALESPS
Gómez, N., & Paredes, E. (2019). Mujer y micromaschismos en la publicidad no convencional de televisión. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/38477/Pages from LIBRO ACTAS I CONGRESO COMUNICACIÓN Y GÉNERO-7%281%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Hernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2020). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta Las rutas Cuantitativa Cualitativa y Mixta. In McGRAW-HILL Interamericana Editores S.A. de C.V. http://repositorio.uasb.edu.bo:8080/bitstream/54000/1292/1/Hernández- Metodología de la investigación.pdf
Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio en estudios de validación: Usos y recomendaciones. Psicothema, 26(3), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: Una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicologia, 30(3), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Mejia, C. R., Cardona-Rivero, A., Galindo, V., Teves-Arccata, M., Chacon, J. I., Fernández-Espíndola, L., & Martinez-Cornejo, I. (2021). Factores asociados con el machismo entre estudiantes de Medicina de ocho ciudades en cinco países Latinoamericanos. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RCP.2021.09.004
Merino Soto, C., & Livia Segovia, J. (2009). Intervalos de confianza asimétricos para el índice la validez de contenido: Un programa Visual Basic para la V de Aiken. Anales de Psicología, 25(1), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.6018/71631
Pedrós, A. (2016). Infidelidad , estilos de amor y micromachismos [Universitat Jaume]. https://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/161716/TFG_2015_pedrosA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Pérez Martínez, V., Sanz Barbero, B., Ferrer Cascales, R., Bowes, N., Ayala, A., Sánchez SanSegundo, M., Albaladejo Blázquez, N., Rosati, N., Neves, S., Pereira Vieira, C., Jankowiak, B., Waszyńska, K., & Vives-Cases, C. (2021). The Role of Social Support in Machismo and Acceptance of Violence Among Adolescents in Europe: Lights4Violence Baseline Results. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(5), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.007
Quero Virla, M. (2010). Confiabilidad y coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach. Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios En Ciencias Sociales. Telos, 12, 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2004.1370608
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under the Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the possibility of copying, distributing, displaying, and producing derivative works, as long as the author is acknowledged and cited.
