Metacognition as a strategy to achieve learning in university students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14867733

Keywords:

higher education, educational strategies, assessment, metacognition, planning

Abstract

The main objective of this research was to analyze the relationship between the use of metacognitive strategies and academic performance in university students. To do so, the study adopted a quantitative approach with a correlational and cross-sectional design. In addition, 54 sixth-cycle students from the Faculty of Education of a public university in the city of Ica were selected as a study sample. Regarding data collection, the instruments used were: the report card and a questionnaire composed of closed questions and measurement scales, which facilitated the quantification of the results. These revealed a positive correlation between both variables, which showed that the greater the use of metacognitive strategies, such as planning, evaluation and control of mental learning processes, the greater the academic performance. These findings underline the importance of strengthening metacognitive self-regulation to optimize learning management. Consequently, the study concluded that it is essential to implement training programs in metacognitive strategies, provide personalized tutoring to low-performing students, and promote self-assessment and critical reflection on the learning process. These actions contribute to academic development and greater autonomy in student learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelrahman, R. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192

Anthonysamy, L. (2021). The use of metacognitive strategies for undisrupted online learning: Preparing university students in the age of pandemic. Educ Inf Technol, 26, 6881–6899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10518-y

Benites, R. (2021). La educación superior universitaria en el Perú post-pandemia. PUCP. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/176597

Carvalho, A., & Santos, C. (2022). Developing peer mentors’ collaborative and metacognitive skills with a technology-enhanced peer learning program. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100070

Castro Camelo, A., Conejo Carrasco, F., Quintero Castrillón, L., & Vega Oviedo, J. (2022). Análisis de la relación entre el rendimiento académico y las estrategias metacognitivas y motivacionales. Actualidades Pedagógicas, (78). https://doi.org/10.19052/ap.vol1.iss78.8

Dindar, M., Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2020). Interplay of metacognitive experiences and performance in collaborative problem solving. Computers & Education, 154, 103922. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103922

Dinsmore, D., Alexander, P., & Loughlin, S. (2008). Enfoque conceptual en la metacognición, la autorregulación y el aprendizaje autorregulado. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391-409.

Ewell, S., Driessen, E., Grogan, W., Johnston, Q., Ferdous, S., Mehari, Y. & Ballen, C. (2023). A Comparison of Study Behaviors and Metacognitive Evaluation Used by Biology Students. CBE. Life Sciences Education, 22(4), 36. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-11-0225

Hayat, A., & Shateri, K. (2019). The role of academic self-efficacy in improving students’ metacognitive learning strategies. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 7(4), 205. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6820011/

Hernández Sampieri, R., & Mendoza Torres, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education. https://virtual.cuautitlan.unam.mx/rudics/?p=2612

Hidayat, R. & Ying, S. (2023). The sub-dimensions of metacognition and their influence on modeling competency. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02290-w

Mitsea, E., & Drigas, A. (2019). A Journey into the metacognitive learning strategies. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 15(14). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i14.11379

Mohseni, F., Seifoori, Z., & Ahangari, S. (2020). The impact of metacognitive strategy training and critical thinking awareness-raising on reading comprehension. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1720946. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1720946

Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Componentes motivacionales y autorregulados del aprendizaje en el desempeño académico en el aula. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1990-21075-001

Pradhan, S. & Das, P. (2021). Influence of metacognition on academic achievement and learning style of undergraduate students in Tezpur University. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.381

Puma Camargo, M. I. (2020). Relación de estrategias metacognitivas y el desarrollo del rendimiento académico en estudiantes de la Escuela Profesional de Educación de la Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios, 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/14694

Rasinger, S. M. (2020). La investigación cuantitativa en lingüística: Una introducción. Akal. https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=0h4EEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rodríguez, I. (2018). La calidad de la educación superior y la reestructuración del programa de tutoría. Revista Iberoamericana para la investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 8(15). https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4981/498154006004.pdf

Susantini, E., Puspitawati, R., Raharjo, & Suaidah, H. (2021). E-book of metacognitive learning strategies: design and implementation to activate student’s self-regulation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), 13. https://telrp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41039-021-00161-z

Urban, K., Pesout, O., Kombrza, J., & Urban, M. (2021). Metacognitively aware university students exhibit higher creativity and motivation to learn. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100963

Zapata, Á. & Lombana, J. (2023). Guía práctica para elaborar proyectos de investigación aplicada en administración, gerencia y negocios (1.ª ed.). Editorial Universidad del Norte. https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=WA7eEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=es&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Zimmerman, BJ (2002). Cómo convertirse en un alumno autorregulado: una descripción general. Theory Into Practice, 41 (2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zumbach, J., Rammerstorfer, L., & Deibl, I. (2020). Cognitive and metacognitive support in learning with a serious game about demographic change. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 120-129.

Published

2025-02-13

How to Cite

Hostia Luque, T. V., Hernández Sono, V. Y., Mendoza León, O., Pérez Mena, C., & Reyes González , M. E. (2025). Metacognition as a strategy to achieve learning in university students. InveCom Journal, 5(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14867733

Most read articles by the same author(s)