Teaching experiences for science learning: a systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15844759

Keywords:

teaching experiences, science learning, strategies

Abstract

Teaching experiences are essential for science learning, especially when they integrate approaches that connect scientific knowledge with social, cultural, and human dimensions. The main objective of this study was to analyze these experiences in the context of science teaching. To this end, a systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA methodology, establishing inclusion criteria based on keywords in English ("teaching experiences" AND "science learning"), selecting open-access articles from high-impact databases such as Scopus and Scielo, published between 2020 and 2025. Paid articles and book chapters were excluded. After the filtering process, 14 articles were selected from Scopus and 7 from Scielo, totaling 21 research articles analyzed. The results show that teaching experiences gain greater relevance when they incorporate innovative methodological approaches, such as Project-Based Learning, which has proven to be especially effective in science teaching. Furthermore, contextual, pedagogical, and technological factors directly influence the quality of these experiences. Supervision, accumulated experience, and a favorable institutional environment enhance the development of pedagogical skills. Finally, it is highlighted that the integration of active methodologies and technological tools—such as artificial intelligence, the flipped classroom, whiteboard animations, educational modules, and platforms like Socrative—encourages immediate and varied feedback, contributing significantly to strengthening scientific learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, I., Syed, Z., Lujabe, K., Mdleleni, Z., Mokoto, M., Pama, B., & Somdaka, B. (2024). An exploration of undergraduate health science students' experiences of blended learning andragogy: A rapid review. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2024/vol54no3a7

Alali, R. M., & Al-Barakat, A. A. (2025). An evaluation of science teachers' practices in using formative assessment to support primary students’ science learning. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.5090

Alsalhi, N. R., Al Qawasmi, A. A., Al Arabi, K. S., Al-Zubaidi, N. A., & Alshannag, Q. (2022). Science teachers’ perceptions of STEM learning and its teaching requirements in Jordanian public schools. Information Sciences Letters, 11(3), 881–899. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/110320

Caballero, F., & Brítez, R. (2024). Inteligencia artificial en el mejoramiento de la enseñanza y aprendizaje, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencias. Academo (Asunción), 11(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.30545/academo.2024.may-ago.1

Chen, Y., So, W. W. M., & Wan, Z. (2023). Elementary school teachers’ beliefs and practices in science teaching using an e-textbook. International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 22(4), 343–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.70725/161754ucybyc

Darmawan, D., Yatimah, D., Sasmita, K., & Syah, R. (2020). Assessment preparation by science tutors in non-formal education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.24025

Duque, W. (2023). Estrategias educativas: percepción de los estudiantes para la mejora del aprendizaje en morfofisiología. Investigaciones Andina, 25(46), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.33132/01248146.2257

Fraile, J., Ruiz-Bravo, P., Zamorano-Sande, D., & Orgaz-Rincón, D. (2021). Socrative como herramienta de evaluación formativa y aprendizaje autorregulado en la enseñanza de actividades físicas en el medio natural. Retos, 42, 724–734. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.87067

Freire, O. (2025). História e ensino de física nas páginas da RBEF: Anotações sobre o passado recente e desafios atuais. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2024-0434

Haynes, N. (2024). Envisioning an orderly Altiplano: Middle class discourses of moral geography on El Alto, Bolivia. Desde el Sur, 16(4), e0055. https://doi.org/10.21142/des-1604-2024-0055

Hidayat, T., Rustaman, N., & Shidiq, A. S. (2020). Science teachers’ perceptions of adapted primary literature as a resource for science learning. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET 2020) (pp. 169–173). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3395245.3396423

Indriyanti, N., & Sari, M. W. (2023). 3rd International Conference on Science, Mathematics, Environment, and Education: Flexibility in Research and Innovation on Science, Mathematics, Environment, and Education for Sustainable Development, ICoSMEE 2021 (Vol. 2540, Article 110009). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105682

Lammert, C., Sharma, R., & Hand, B. (2023). Early childhood teachers’ epistemic orientations and their use of knowledge generation practices for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 45(6), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2164474

Leonardo, M., & Cha, J. (2021). Enhancing science teachers’ self-efficacy during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evaluating professional development webinars through a Universal Design for Learning (UDL) lens. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(2), 421–451. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10035

Mattos, V., Antunes, Z., Tavares, B., Barreto, R., da Costa, G., & Freitas, M. (2024). Low-carbon agricultural technologies improve forage and feed production in the Caatinga biome, Brazil: Characteristics, comparison, effects of climate change, resilience, local development, and food security. Scientia Agropecuaria, 15(4), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2024.046

Neves, M. da C., & Sasaki, D. G. G. (2025). Aprendizagem baseada em projetos na área de Ciências do ensino fundamental: Uma revisão sistemática. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 31. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320250009

Riggs, C., & Lee, D. N. (2022). Garden-based learning: Cultivating science identity and engagement. American Biology Teacher, 84(4), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2022.84.4.213

Ryane, I., & El Faddouli, N. (2020). A case study of using Edmodo to enhance computer science learning for engineering students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11252

Septiyanto, A., Widodo, A., & Prima, E. C. (2024). Science content knowledge of elementary school teachers: A case study. Acta Scientiae, 26(1), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7889

Suwardika, G., Sopandi, A. T., Indrawan, I. P. O., & Masakazu, K. (2024). Enhancing self-regulation, critical thinking and communication skills through flipped classroom with whiteboard animation and modules in webinar tutorials. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 19(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2023-0115

Tierno, S. P., Solbes, J., Gavidia, V., & Tuzón, P. (2022). Propuestas de educación científica y didáctica de las ciencias experimentales de los formadores de profesorado de primaria. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 97(36.1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v97i36.1.92489

Tshuma, T., & Nyamupangedengu, E. (2024). Drama in the science classroom: Reimagining the teaching of natural and life sciences. Educational Research for Social Change, 13(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2024/v13i1a2

Turnadi, T., Danim, S., Kristiawan, M., & Ramdhani, R. (2023). The relationship between clinical supervision, teaching experience, and organizational climate on teacher skills in science learning. En M. Kristiawan, R. La’biran, J. R. T. Arrang, A. J. Obaid, M. Muthmainnah, E. Apriani, & A. A. Elngar (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings, 2736(81). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0174694

Umbarila-Castiblanco, X., & Cárdenas-Salgado, F. (2023). La estrategia I4C: una estrategia didáctica para el desarrollo de habilidades de pensamiento y el aprendizaje de la química. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED, (53), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num53-13085

You, H. S., Park, S., & Delgado, C. (2021). School characteristics associated with scientific literacy: Evidence from PISA 2015 in the United States. Science Education, 105(2), 406–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21609

Published

2025-07-08

Issue

Section

Communication of Science: Bibliometrics and systematic reviews.

How to Cite

Peña Vargas, R. Y., & Rueda Chavez, F. E. (2025). Teaching experiences for science learning: a systematic review. InveCom Journal, 6(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15844759

Most read articles by the same author(s)