Effectiveness of the governance model in public management: A systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17148137

Keywords:

public administration, governance, citizen participation

Abstract

Public administration has undergone significant evolution due to digitalization and the growing demand for a more engaged and demanding citizenry, which has spurred the adoption of more open and collaborative governance models. In this context, this study conducts a systematic literature review combined with a bibliometric analysis, with the aim of identifying the governance models currently used in contemporary public administration. To this end, the PRISMA method was applied, and databases such as Google Scholar and Scopus were consulted, focusing the search on the period between 2015 and 2025. After a rigorous selection process, a total of 19 relevant articles were analyzed. The results indicate a clear transition from traditional hierarchical structures to more horizontal, collaborative, and adaptive models. Furthermore, it is concluded that effective governance depends on the ability to adapt to profound technological changes, as well as on fostering social inclusion and citizen participation, with the ultimate goal of promoting social well-being. Thus, this study provides evidence that supports the need to make public administration more flexible and democratic in order to address contemporary challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alqooti, A. (2020). Public governance in the public sector: Literature review. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance (IJBEG), 3(3), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.51325/ijbeg.v3i3.47

Bason, C., & Austin, R. D. (2021). Design in the public sector: Toward a human centred model of public governance. Public Management Review, 24(11), 1727–1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1919186

Birkstedt, T., Minkkinen, M., Tandon, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2023). AI governance: Themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas. Internet Research, 33(7), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2022-0042

Blanco, A. (2024). Administración pública y gobernanza en Colombia: Aportes para una gestión transparente en clave dialéctica. Administración & Desarrollo, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.22431/25005227.vol54n1.903

Cárdenas, H. W., Lino, D. J., & León, L. A. (2020). Nueva gestión pública y gobernanza: Una comparación de dos paradigmas para hacer frente a problemas complejos modernos. Ciencia y Educación, 1(9), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8266344

Chang, A., & Brewer, G. A. (2023). Street-level bureaucracy in public administration: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2191–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065517

Dandan, J. (2024). The challenges and opportunities of public governance in the digital era. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v2n3.64

Di Vaio, A., Trujillo, L., D'Amore, G., & Palladino, R. (2021). Water governance models for meeting sustainable development Goals: A structured literature review. Utilities Policy, 72, 101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101255

Falcão, H., Mota, J., & Marini, C. (2017). Business models in the public domain: The public governance canvas. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-395167893

Ferreira, A., & Santos, C. (2025). Digital transformation in public sector: Systematic literature review. In Enhancing public sector accountability and services through digital innovation (pp. 265–288). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9251-5.ch008

Filgueiras, F., Palotti, P., & Testa, G. (2023). Complejización de los estilos de gobernanza: Conexión entre la política y las políticas públicas en las teorías de gobernanza. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158521

Giotitsas, C., Nardelli, P. H. J., Kostakis, V., & Narayanan, A. (2020). From private to public governance: The case for reconfiguring energy systems as a commons. Energy Research & Social Science, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101737

Grossi, G., & Argento, D. (2022). The fate of accounting for public governance development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 272–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2020-5001

Grossman, G., & Slough, T. (2022). Government responsiveness in developing countries. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-112501

Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917

Iacovino, N. M., Barsanti, S., & Cinquini, L. (2017). Public organizations between old public administration, new public management and public governance: The case of the Tuscany Region. Public Organization Review, 17, 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0327-x

Idzi, F. M., & Correa, R. (2022). Digital governance: Government strategies that impact public services. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2, 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00055-w

Jia, N., Huang, K. G., & Zhang, C. M. (2019). Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0543

Lawal, C., Friday, S., Ayodeji, D., & Sobowale, A. (2024). Advances in public-private partnerships for strengthening national financial governance and crisis response systems. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 6(4), 1700–1719. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2024.4.6.4101

Longo, F. (2020). Gobernanza pública para la innovación. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 76. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n76.a198

Massey, A., & Johnston-Miller (2016). Governance: Public governance to social innovation? Policy & Politics, 44(4), 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X14042230109592

McMullin, C. (2020). Challenging the necessity of New Public Governance: Co-production by third sector organizations under different models of public management. Public Administration, 99(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12672

Meijer, A. J., Lips, M., & Chen, K. (2019). Open governance: A new paradigm for understanding urban governance in an information age. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2019.00003

Mendoza, R. P., Vela, L., & Dávila, J. D. (2024). La gobernanza y la optimización del gasto público. Una revisión de literatura. Suma de Negocios, 15(32), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumneg/2024.V15.N32.A7

Mercado-Marrufo, C. E., & Baylon-Salvador, E. G. (2024). Hacia una gobernanza pública inteligente desde la gobernabilidad. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1072

Meuleman, L. (2021). Public administration and governance for the SDGs: Navigating between change and stability. Sustainability, 13(11), 5914. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115914

Mishra, V., & Mishra, M. P. (2023). PRISMA for review of management literature–method, merits, and limitations–an academic review. In Advancing Methodologies of Conducting Literature Review in Management Domain (pp. 125–136). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2754-586520230000002007

Prasad, M. (2024). Expanding practices of e-governance system in the contemporary world. Journey for Sustainable Development and Peace Journal, 2(2), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.3126/jsdpj.v2i2.69570

Riski, R. (2025). Public sector governance in local governments: Challenges and opportunities in West Pasaman Regency. Agile Governance and Innovation Measurement Journal, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18196/agimjournal.v2i1.16

Risna, A. (2023). The impact of good governance on the quality of public management decision making. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.21

Rodríguez, M. P. (2015). Governance models for the delivery of public services through the Web 2.0 technologies: A political view in large Spanish municipalities. Social Science Computer Review, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315609919

Testi, N., Marconi, R., & Pasher, E. (2025). Exploring the potential of blockchain technology for citizen engagement in smart governance. Open Research Europe, 3(183). https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16153.4

Thabit, S., Sancino, A., & Mora, L. (2025). Strategic public value(s) governance: A systematic literature review and framework for analysis. Public Administration Review, 85(3), 885–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13877

Tomaževič, N., Kovač, P., Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., Babaoğlu, C., Bohatá, M., Hirsch, B., Kulaç, O., Nurlybaeva, G. K., Schäfer, F.-S., & Aristovnik, A. (2023). The role of agile values in enhancing good governance in public administration during the COVID-19 crisis: An international survey. Administrative Sciences, 13(12), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13120248

Ulnicane, I., Eke, D., Knight, W., Ogoh, G., & Stahl, B. C. (2021). Good governance as a response to discontents? Déjà vu, or lessons for AI from other emerging technologies. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 46(1-2), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1840220

Verma, S. (2022). Sentiment analysis of public services for smart society: Literature review and future research directions. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101708

Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y. C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577

Published

2025-09-17

Issue

Section

Communication of Science: Bibliometrics and systematic reviews.

How to Cite

Dominguez Montalvo, G. T., Tarco Sánchez, A., Alatrista Gironzini, M. M., Zavalaga Bustos, C. E., & Palomino Vargas, J. L. (2025). Effectiveness of the governance model in public management: A systematic review. InveCom Journal, 6(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17148137