Media coverage of lepidolite and lithium carbonate in the Peruvian press
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20736180Keywords:
media coverage, lithium, lepidolite, lithium carbonate, framing analysis, Peruvian press, extractive technologies, environmental communicationAbstract
This study examines how the Peruvian press covered lithium-related issues between 2018 and 2025, focusing on the symbolic construction of extractive technologies, particularly the processing of lepidolite for lithium carbonate production, within news discourse. Through a content analysis of 1,244 news articles from four leading media outlets—El Comercio, La República, Gestión, and RPP—the study identifies dominant frames, source attribution patterns, and tone valences associated with media coverage. Five interpretive frames were coded: economic opportunity, geopolitical strategy, environmental concern, social conflict, and technological innovation. The findings reveal a marked predominance of the economic opportunity frame (40.9%), particularly in business-oriented media, followed by the geopolitical strategy frame (21.2%). Source attribution analysis shows that government officials (38.4%) and industry representatives (27.6%) dominated news discourse, while Indigenous communities accounted for only 4.1% of citations. Tone analysis confirms that economic and innovation frameworks presented positive valences, while environmental and social conflict frameworks consistently displayed negative tones. This study contributes to research on the mediatization of extractive industries in Latin America and highlights the limited representation of communities directly affected by lithium development in the Andean territories.
Downloads
References
Arellano-Yanguas, J. (2019). Extractive industries and regional development: Lessons from Peru on the limitations of revenue devolution to producing regions. Regional and Federal Studies, 29(2), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2018.1493461
Barandiarán, J. (2019). Lithium and development imaginaries in Chile, Argentina and Bolivia. World Development, 113, 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.019
Bebbington, A., Abdulai, A., Humphreys Bebbington, D., Hinfelaar, M., & Sanborn, C. (2018). Governing extractive industries: Politics, histories, ideas. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820932.001.0001
Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775
Conde, M., & Le Billon, P. (2017). Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not? The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(3), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.04.009
Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Lund, A. B., & Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication, 24(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098943
Damonte, G., & Glave, M. (Eds.). (2016). Industrias extractivas y desarrollo rural territorial en los Andes peruanos. GRADE.
De Echave, J. (2020). La minería y los conflictos sociales en el Perú: balance y perspectivas. CooperAcción.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Gamio, P. (2022). Litio y desarrollo: oportunidades para el Perú. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Northwestern University Press.
Gárate, F. (2024). Litio peruano: entre la promesa económica y los desafíos socioambientales. Revista de Sociología, 35, 87–104.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
Hajer, M. A. (2005). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019829333X.001.0001
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–79 (pp. 128–138). Routledge.
Hansen, A. (2019). Environment, media and communication (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625317
International Energy Agency. (2024). Global critical minerals outlook 2024 [Report]. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2024
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lengauer, G., Esser, F., & Berganza, R. (2012). Negativity in political news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427800
Macroconsult. (2023). Perspectivas del litio en el Perú: oportunidades y desafíos. Reporte Macroconsult.
Matthes, J. (2009). What's in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world's leading communication journals, 1990–2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600206
Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878
Picard, R. G. (2014). Twilight or new dawn of journalism? Evidence from the changing news ecosystem. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 488–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.905338
Riofrancos, T. (2023). Resource radicals: From petro-nationalism to post-extractivism in Ecuador. Duke University Press.
Sanchez-Lopez, M. D. (2023). Geopolitics of the Li-ion battery value chain and the Lithium Triangle in South America. Latin American Policy, 14(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12285
Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2014). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 619–632). Oxford University Press.
Svampa, M. (2019). Las fronteras del neoextractivismo en América Latina: conflictos socioambientales, giro ecoterritorial y nuevas dependencias. CALAS. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839445266
Voskoboynik, D. M., & Andreucci, D. (2022). Greening extractivism: Environmental discourses and resource governance in the Lithium Triangle. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(2), 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211006345
Wolfsfeld, G. (2011). Making sense of media and politics: Five principles in political communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839607
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under the Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the possibility of copying, distributing, displaying, and producing derivative works, as long as the author is acknowledged and cited.
