Governance and social vulnerability in disaster risk management: a systematic review of Latin American literature (2005–2025)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

disaster risk governance, social vulnerability, Latin America

Abstract

This study analyzes the relationship between disaster risk governance and social vulnerability in Latin America through a systematic literature review covering the period 2005–2025. Following the PRISMA protocol, 18 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO were selected and analyzed in order to identify theoretical approaches, analytical patterns, and research gaps regarding the social construction of disaster risk. The findings show that disaster risk governance has evolved from predominantly institutional and reactive approaches toward more complex frameworks that integrate social vulnerability, state capacity, and community participation as interdependent dimensions. Evidence consistently indicates that vulnerability is not a static condition but a socially produced process shaped by structural inequalities, urban segregation, and institutional weaknesses. The review also reveals a persistent gap between international policy frameworks and their effective implementation at national and local levels, limiting risk reduction outcomes. In addition, community participation is found to enhance resilience, although its effectiveness depends on institutionalization levels and power asymmetries within governance arrangements. The study concludes that disaster risk governance in Latin America is characterized by an incomplete transition in which technocratic and socio-political approaches coexist, highlighting the need for more integrated frameworks that better articulate state, society, and territory in the production and reduction of risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alves, P., de Sousa, M., Djordjević, S., & Javadi, A. (2021). Place-based citizen science for assessing risk perception and coping capacity of households affected by multiple hazards. Sustainability, 13(1), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010302

Blanco, D., Ortiz, C., & Sáenz, X. (2025). Empoderando comunidades: investigación-acción-participativa en gestión de riesgos y desastres en Tausa, Colombia. Cultura de los Cuidados, 29(70), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.14198/cuid.27617

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235930866_Systematic_Approaches_to_a_Successful_Literature_Review

Cabral-Ramírez, M., Niño-Barrero, Y., & DiBella, J. (2025). Lessons from the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction from Latin America and the Caribbean. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 16, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00613-w

Campos, K., & Gil, M. (2025). State Legibility and Disaster Management in Chile: Strengths, Challenges, and Lessons for Public Policy. Sustainability, 17(9), 3917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093917

Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M., & Welch, V. (2022). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.3). Cochrane. https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current

Lavell, A., Chávez, A., Barros, C., & Miranda, D. (2023). Inequality and the social construction of urban disaster risk in multi-hazard contexts: the case of Lima, Peru and the COVID-19 pandemic. Environment & Urbanization, 35(1), 131-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478221149883

Lucatello, S., & Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2024). Sustainable Synergy: Strengthening disaster risk reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean through nature-based solutions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 113, 104860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104860

Marcillo-Delgado, J., Alvarez-Garcia, A., & García-Carrillo, Á. (2021). Analysis of risk and disaster reduction strategies in South American countries. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 61, 102363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102363

Melo, T., Guimarães, L., & Philippe, T. (2024). Disaster governance and the role of civil society: A study of the mining disaster in Brumadinho, Brazil. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 33(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104945

Mitchell, S. (2024). Patterns of government disaster policy response in Peru. World Development, 182, 106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106707

Monteiro, D., Libonati, R., Garcia, B., Geirinhas, J., Salvi, B., Silva, E., Rodrigues, J., Peres, L., Russo, A., Gracie, R., Gurgel, H., & Trigo, R. (2024). Twenty-first-century demographic and social inequalities of heat-related deaths in Brazilian urban areas. PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0295766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295766

Natenzon, C. (2023). ¿La gestión del riesgo o los riesgos de la gestión? Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos sobre Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres, 7(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.55467/reder.v7i1.103

Oda, P., Marchezini, V., Lotta, G., Ferreira, A., Cotting, A., Cota, K., & Pacheco, O. (2025). State, institutional and organizational capacities in disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 129, 105777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105777

Page, M., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L., Stewart, L., Thomas, J., Tricco, A., Welch, V., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ramos-García, C., Rodríguez, A., Rojas, M., Falla, S., & Rocha, A. (2024). Apropiación social de conocimiento para la gestión del riesgo de desastres: Aprendizajes de una experiencia con comunidades de Cundinamarca, Colombia. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos sobre Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres, 8(1), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.55467/reder.v8i1.153

Rivas, R., Maldonado, L., Campos, K., & Ojeda, L. (2024). Capacidad estatal y vulnerabilidad ante el riesgo de desastres: El caso del megaincendio de 2014 en Valparaíso, Chile. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos sobre Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres, 8(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.55467/reder.v8i2.168

Sandoval-Díaz, J., Navarrete, M., & Cuadra, D. (2023). Revisión sistemática sobre la capacidad de adaptación y resiliencia comunitaria ante desastres socionaturales en América Latina y el Caribe. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos sobre Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres, 7(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.55467/reder.v7i2.132

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Ulbrich, P., Leal, A., Rivera-Flórez, L., Rodríguez-Gaviria, E., Coaffee, J., Marchezini, V., & Porto, J. (2023). Assessing equity in disaster risk governance in Brazil and Colombia. Disaster Prevention and Management, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-06-2023-0142

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Marco de Sendai para la Reducción de Riesgo de Desastres 2015-2030. United Nations. https://www.undrr.org/media/16098/download?startDownload=20260807

van Minnen, T. & Coates, R. (2025) Maquiagem: Concealing the politicized nature of urban disaster and housing policy in Petrópolis, Brazil. Journal of Political Ecology 32(1), 6223. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.6223

Wager, E., & Kleinert, S. (2011). Responsible research publication: International standards for authors. PRILOZI, 35(3),35-41. https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2015-0006

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

Mejía Ninahuaman, L. A. (2026). Governance and social vulnerability in disaster risk management: a systematic review of Latin American literature (2005–2025). InveCom Journal, 6(Especial 1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/