Validation of a pedagogical reading model to develop communicative competencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23127416Keywords:
communicative competence, reading comprehension, secondary educationAbstract
Integrating reading comprehension, writing, and oral communication skills in secondary education presents a complex challenge but also a transformative opportunity. Consequently, this study aimed to design, validate, and pilot a pedagogical reading model focused on developing communicative competencies. The research—conducted as a pedagogical action study with a qualitative approach and a proposal-oriented scope—involved the purposive participation of 23 third-year students from a public school. Data collection combined various techniques and instruments, including participant observation, analysis of written work, semi-structured interviews, rubrics, checklists, and a field journal. The resulting evidence was organized through content analysis and triangulation to ensure rigor and depth. Four specialists evaluated the model based on relevance, coherence, clarity, and applicability, yielding an overall Aiken’s V of 0.89, which indicates high validity. Following four pilot sessions, a shift was observed toward the "expected achievement" and "outstanding" levels in reading comprehension, written production, and oral expression. Furthermore, qualitative findings revealed that students drew more complex inferences, organized their texts more effectively, and demonstrated greater confidence when presenting oral arguments. In summary, the model proved relevant and viable within the studied context. However, due to the small sample size and the absence of a comparison group, the observed changes do not allow for establishing causal relationships regarding the model's effectiveness, highlighting the need for future research with more robust designs.
Downloads
References
Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., Kim, J. Y., Crassas, M. E., & Doyle, B. (2020). Reading: What else matters besides strategies and skills? The Reading Teacher, 66(6), 440-448. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1012760
Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040143
Cassany, D. (2006). Tras las líneas: Sobre la lectura contemporánea. Anagrama.
Cassany, D. (2008). Prácticas letradas contemporáneas. Ríos de Tinta.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition & Communication, 32(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Gee, J. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (5ª ed.). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315722511/social-linguistics-literacies-james-gee
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. En J. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Penguin Books.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Muslimin, A. I., Nur, M., & Francisca Maria, I. (2024). Evaluating Cami AI Across SAMR Stages: Students’ Achievement and Perceptions in EFL Writing Instruction: Cami AI-SAMR in EFL Writing Instruction. Online Learning, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4246
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective. System, 121, 103225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225
Sanz-Tejeda, A., Domínguez-Oller, J. C., Baldaquí-Escandell, J. M., Gómez-Díaz, R., & García-Rodríguez, A. (2026). The impact of generative AI on academic reading and writing: A synthesis of recent evidence (2023–2025). Frontiers in Education, 10, 1711718. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1711718
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Solé, I. (1992). Estrategias de lectura. Graó.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under the Attribution License (CC BY), allowing the possibility of copying, distributing, displaying, and producing derivative works, as long as the author is acknowledged and cited.







