Active learning methods using generative AI and meaningful learning: systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23221171

Keywords:

AI-based methodologies, meaningful learning, systematic review

Abstract

The incorporation of generative artificial intelligence into higher education opened up new possibilities for

developing active methodologies, although its contribution to meaningful learning required closer examination. The objective of this research was to conduct a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on active methodologies enhanced by generative artificial intelligence and their relationship to meaningful learning in the university setting. A conceptual and quantitative analytical literature review was conducted. The search was conducted between February and May 2026 in Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO, and included publications from 2017 through May 2026. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed to document the identification and selection of studies. The bibliometric analysis examined the temporal evolution of the publications, the first author’s affiliation, and the scientific journals; a review of the articles allowed for the characterization of the pedagogical strategies and learning outcomes addressed. A higher concentration of publications was observed in 2024, as well as a distribution of the studies across institutions in different geographic contexts and journals specializing in education and technology. The studies examined uses of generative artificial intelligence in tutoring, collaborative activities, and feedback processes, but employed different criteria to assess learning. It was concluded that incorporating these elements into active learning methodologies provided opportunities to enrich the college experience; however, participation or performance alone did not demonstrate meaningful learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Bai, H., Lui, W. C., & Khiatani, P. V. (2025). Promoting student engagement with GPTutor: An intelligent tutoring system powered by generative AI. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00571-9

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Brassler, M., & Dettmers, J. (2017). How to enhance interdisciplinary competence—Interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1686

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field. TechTrends, 68, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0

Dai, K., Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2026). Generative AI in higher education: A bibliometric review of emerging trends, power dynamics, and global research landscapes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10, Article 100544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100544

Ding, L., O’Berry, R., Tallent, H., Gharti Chhetri G C, S., & Gapud, A. (2026). Learning with large language models: Beyond prompt engineering. Education and Information Technologies, 31, 2877–2901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13924-2

Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., & Amankwa, J. O. (2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198

Gao, Z. Y., Cheah, J. H., Lim, X. J., & Luo, X. (2024). Enhancing the academic performance of business students using generative AI: An interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(2), Article 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958

Groothuijsen, S., van den Beemt, A., Remmers, J. C., & van Meeuwen, L. W. (2024). AI chatbots in programming education: Students’ use in a scientific computing course and consequences for learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100290

Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024). Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students’ feedback quality and writing ability. The Internet and Higher Education, 63, Article 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

Huang, H., Liu, Y., Dong, M., & Lu, C. (2024). Integrating AIGC into product design ideation teaching: An empirical study on self-efficacy and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 92, Article 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101929

Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225

Lachheb, A., Leung, J., Abramenka-Lachheb, V., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2025). AI in higher education: A bibliometric analysis, synthesis, and a critique of research. The Internet and Higher Education, 67, Article 101021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101021

Luo, J., Zheng, C., Yin, J., & Teo, H. H. (2025). Design and assessment of AI-based learning tools in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00540-2

Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human–AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, Article 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

Pallant, J. L., Blijlevens, J., Campbell, A., & Jopp, R. (2026). Mastering knowledge: The impact of generative AI on student learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 51(4), 714–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2487570

Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field. TechTrends, 69, 1105–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1

Wei, X., Wang, L., Lee, L.-K., & Liu, R. (2025). The effects of generative AI on collaborative problem-solving and team creativity performance in digital story creation: An experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00526-0

Weng, X., Xia, Q., Gu, M., Rajaram, K., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Assessment and learning outcomes for generative AI in higher education: A scoping review on current research status and trends. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9540

Xie, Z. H., Wu, X. Z., & Xie, Y. X. (2024). Can interaction with generative artificial intelligence enhance learning autonomy? A longitudinal study from comparative perspectives of virtual companionship and knowledge acquisition preferences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12863

Yang, Y., Luo, J., Yang, M., Yang, R., & Chen, J. (2024). From surface to deep learning approaches with generative AI in higher education: An analytical framework of student agency. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2327003

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Downloads

Published

2026-10-06

Issue

Section

Communication of Science: Bibliometrics and systematic reviews.

How to Cite

Carranza Liza , M. R., Beltrán Canaría, W. A., Carrillo Valverde, M. E., & Feijoo-Parra, M. F. O. (2026). Active learning methods using generative AI and meaningful learning: systematic review. InveCom Journal, 6(Especial 2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23221171

Most read articles by the same author(s)