Participatory urban management in the recovery of neighborhood parks in a Peruvian city

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15833355

Keywords:

participatory urban management, neighborhood parks, neighborhood cohesion

Abstract

This paper aims to explain how participatory urban management influenced the restoration of neighborhood parks in the José Quiñones neighborhood of Chiclayo during 2017 and 2018. A mixed-methods research design was used, considering two universes: a population-based approach, comprised of 3,550 residents, and a spatial approach, comprised of five parks. Using purposive exclusion sampling, the final sample included 302 residents and two parks. Observation techniques, surveys, and in-depth interviews were used to collect data, allowing for analysis of both resident behavior and the physical condition of recreational areas. The results show that participatory urban management, led by residents themselves, was instrumental in the physical and social restoration of Alipio Ponce Vásquez Park. Leadership and collective commitment facilitated the maintenance and sustained intervention of the space, promoting the common good. In contrast, in Eloy Ureta Park, a lack of neighborhood cohesion and internal conflicts hampered organization, resulting in the park's deterioration and an unsafe environment. In conclusion, a direct relationship is confirmed between participatory urban management and the restoration of neighborhood parks, as the active involvement of residents strengthens the social fabric, increases the sense of belonging, and contributes to creating healthier and safer public environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borja, J. (2013). Revolución urbana y derechos ciudadanos. Alianza Editorial.

Fernández, M. (2008, Oct 28). ¿Por qué es necesaria la participación ciudadana en el urbanismo? Ciudades a Escala Humana. https://www.ciudadesaescalahumana.org/2008/10/por-qu-es-necesaria-la-participacin.html

Freire, J. (2009). Urbanismo emergente: ciudad, tecnología e innovación social. En SEPES Entidad Estatal del Suelo (Ed.), Paisajes domésticos, redes en borde (Vol. 4, pp. 18–27). España. https://nomada.blogs.com/jfreire/2010/03/urbanismo-emergente-ciudad-tecnologa-e-innovacin-social.html

Gehl, J. (2010). Ciudades para la gente. Ediciones Infinito.

Hernández Bonilla, M. (2007). Participación ciudadana y el rescate de la ciudad. Revista INVI, 22(59). https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-8358.2007.62132

Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great american cities. Publicaciones Capitan Swing Libros.

Ladizesky, J. (2011). El espacio barrial. Criterios de diseño para un espacio público habitado (1a ed.). Bisman Ediciones.

Miranda, J. (2004). Las juntas vecinales como espacios de desentralización vecinal (1a ed.). Imprenta Gráfica Navarrete S.R.L.

Montoya, C. (2018). Participación ciudadana y políticas de urbanismo en grandes ciudades [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Complutense de Madrid]. https://docta.ucm.es/entities/publication/08462b72-ebac-4a9f-86c3-9388996e86a3.

Murillo, F., & Schweitzer, M. (2011). Planear el Barrio: Urbanismo participativo para construir el derecho a la ciudad (1a ed.). Editorial Cuentahilos.

Rangel, M. (2002). Los cien del espacio público para la vida sociocultural urbana. Universidad de Los Andes. http://www.saber.ula.ve/bitstream/handle/123456789/39797/Rangel_2002.pdf?sequenc

Published

2025-07-08

How to Cite

Gálvez Villanueva, O. T., Escalante Medina, C. R., & García Aurich, M. L. (2025). Participatory urban management in the recovery of neighborhood parks in a Peruvian city. InveCom Journal, 6(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15833355

Most read articles by the same author(s)