Flipped classroom as a learning strategy for university students: A systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18233137

Keywords:

flipped classroom, university learning, higher education

Abstract

The flipped classroom model has gained relevance in higher education as a pedagogical strategy that promotes active and autonomous learning among university students. Therefore, this study analyzed its implications for improving learning in university contexts through a systematic review, guided by the PRISMA guidelines. The search was conducted in Scopus and SciELO using the descriptors “flipped classroom,” “learning,” and “flipped learning,” combined with the Boolean operator AND. Scientific articles published between 2020 and 2025 were included, applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the studies identified, 21 met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed. The results show that the flipped classroom improves academic performance, increases student motivation and active participation, and fosters self-regulated learning and academic satisfaction. In conclusion, it is positioned as an effective and innovative strategy for optimizing teaching and learning processes in higher education, especially when integrated with active methodologies and educational technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhami, N., & Taghizadeh, M. (2024). Integrating inquiry-based learning and computer supported collaborative learning into flipped classroom: effects on academic writing performance and perceptions of students of railway engineering. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2046107

Aghaei, K., Rajabi, M., Lie, K., & Ajam, F. (2020). Flipped learning as situated practice: A contrastive narrative inquiry in an EFL classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1607–1623. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-019-10039-9

Alyoussef, I. Y. (2022). Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Heliyon, 8(12), e12529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12529

Astleitner, H. (2018). Multidimensional engagement in learning: An integrated instructional design. Journal of Instructional Research, 7, 6–32. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1188334.pdf

Baig, M., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(61), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5

Barahona, C., Nussbaum, M., Espinosa, P., Meneses, A., Alario-Hoyos, C., & Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2022). Transforming the learning experience in pre-service teacher training using the flipped classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2041476

Bashir, S., & Hamid, I. (2021). Pharmacy students’ perception of learning and engagement in a flipped classroom of a physiology course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1871395

Chen, H-R., & Hsu, W-C. (2022). Do flipped learning and adaptive instruction improve student learning outcome? A case study of a computer programming course in Taiwan. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 768183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.768183

Chicaiza, M. (2023). Modelo de aula invertida para el aprendizaje del vocabulario en inglés. Mendive. Revista de Educación, 21(1). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1815-76962023000100004

Codina, L. (2018). Revisiones sistematizadas en ciencias humanas y sociales: Fundamentos y pautas. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

Colomo-Magaña, E., Soto-Varela, R., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & Gómez-García, M. (2020). University students’ perception of the usefulness of the flipped classroom methodology. Education Sciences, 10(10), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100275

Divjak, B., Rienties, B., Iniesto, F., Vondra, P., & Žižak, M. (2022). Flipped classrooms in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings and future research recommendations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00316-4

Donato Vega, E. (2023). Niveles de satisfacción en la implementación de la clase invertida a través de educación virtual. Horizontes. Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 7(28), 809–822. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v7i28.556

Faro, M., Gutu, T., & Hunde, A. (2024). Improving student engagement with a flipped classroom instruction model in Ethiopian higher education institutions: The case of Mattu University. PLOS ONE, 19(10), e0307382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307382

Ferreras Fernández, T. (2016). Visibilidad e impacto de la literatura gris científica en repositorios institucionales de acceso abierto. Estudio de caso bibliométrico del repositorio Gredos de la Universidad de Salamanca [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca]. GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca. https://gredos.usal.es/handle/10366/132444

Gondal, S. A., Khan, A. Q., Cheema, E. U., & Dehele, I. S. (2024). Impact of the flipped classroom on students’ academic performance and satisfaction in pharmacy education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2378246

Güler, M., Kokoç, M., & Önder-Bütüner, S. (2023). Does a flipped classroom model work in mathematics education? A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11143-z

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación (6a ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Huang, A. Y., Lu, O. H., & Yang, S. J. (2023). Effects of artificial intelligence-enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ engagement and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 194, 104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104684

Hwang, G-H. (2024). Impacts of backgrounds on students’ self-regulated learning in a flipped classroom setting. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(3), 2422–2439. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2409414

Karaoğlan, F. (2021). An investigation into the role of course satisfaction on students’ engagement and motivation in a mobile‐assisted learning management system flipped classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1940257

Khlaisang, J., Teo, T., & Huang, F. (2021). Acceptance of a flipped smart application for learning among Thai university students. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612447

Kuo, Y. C., Lin, Y. H., Wang, T. H., Lin, H. C. K., Chen, J. I., & Huang, Y. M. (2022). Student learning effect using flipped classroom with WPSA learning mode - An Example of Programming Design Course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(6), 824–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2086150

Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Suárez, C., Quiroga, S., Anzano-Oto, S., Lira-Rodríguez, E., & Salamanca-Villate, A. (2021). Facilitating self-efficacy in university students: an interactive approach with Flipped Classroom. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1603–1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1937067

Naing, C., Whittaker, M., Aung, H., Chellappan, D., & Riegelman, A. (2023). The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(3), e1339. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1339

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Sharma, P. (2018). Flipped classroom: A constructivist approach. International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences, 8(8), 164–169. https://www.indusedu.org/pdfs/IJREISS/IJREISS_2139_41011.pdf

Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314

Tramullas, J. (2020). Temas y métodos de investigación en Ciencia de la Información, 2000-2019. Revisión bibliográfica. Profesional de la Información, 29(4), e290417. https://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com/index.php/EPI/article/download/77328/60871/268846

Xiao, L., Larkins, R., & Meng, L. (2018). Track effect: Unraveling the enhancement of college students’ autonomous learning by using a flipped classroom approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1415815

Yalcinkaya Gokdogan, B., Busra Coruk, R., Benzaghta, M., & Kara, A. (2023). A hybrid-flipped classroom approach: students’ perception and performance assessment. Ingeniería e investigación, 43(3), e98094. https://repositori.upf.edu/items/2b0393dc-eff0-4d23-8bc0-2764bb80e570#page=1

Yıldız, E., Doğan, U., Özbay, Ö., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2022). Flipped classroom in higher education: An investigation of instructor perceptions through the lens of TPACK. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 10757–10783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11059-8

Zhong, L. (2024). Towards the pivotal factors for the influence of flipped classroom on students’ self-regulated learning and EFL speaking competence. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2351733

Published

2026-01-11

Issue

Section

Communication of Science: Bibliometrics and systematic reviews.

How to Cite

Flores Reyes, J. M., Charry Aysanoa, J. M., & Vasquez Tafur, L. A. (2026). Flipped classroom as a learning strategy for university students: A systematic review. InveCom Journal, 6(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18233137

Most read articles by the same author(s)