Artificial Intelligence and digital governance in public administration: systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20835763

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, public administration, Latin America

Abstract

The study analyzes the relationship between artificial intelligence and digital governance in public administration through a systematic review in Scopus and Web of Science covering the 2018–2025 search period. The literature search was conducted using PRISMA 2020 and its extension, PRISMA-S, to ensure transparency in the identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion stages of the studies. Initially, 379 records were identified. After removing 101 duplicates, 278 documents were screened, from which 50 scientific articles were ultimately selected. The findings reveal a recent and rapidly growing body of scientific literature, focused primarily on ethics, transparency, responsibility, and accountability (92%); regulation of artificial intelligence (84%); risks, oversight, and institutional challenges (82%); decision automation (80%); and efficiency, modernization, or improvement of public services (70%). However, only 24% of the studies explicitly addressed issues related to equity, inclusion, or inequality. The study concludes that AI in public administration requires responsible governance, continuous human oversight, clear regulations, and the strengthening of state capacities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeleke, F., & Razzano, G. (2024). Algorithms and Administrative Justice in Africa: A Case Study from Nigeria. Development 2024 67:1, 67(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41301-024-00407-5

Al-Ansi, A. M., Garad, A., Jaboob, M., & Al-Ansi, A. (2024). Elevating e-government: Unleashing the power of AI and IoT for enhanced public services. Heliyon, 10(23). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40591

Al-Kasasbeh, H. H., Albalawee, N., Al-Khawaja, H. A., & Qtaishat, A. K. (2025). Legal Challenges of Using AI and Big Data in Public Administration: Administrative Liability, Data Protection, and Public Services Efficiency. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(6), 2639–2650. https://doi.org/10.18280/IJSDP.200631

Androniceanu, A., & Colesca, S. E. (2025). Triple Helix Model and Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration. Central European Public Administration Review, 23(2), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.17573/CEPAR.2025.2.03

Attard-Frost, B., Brandusescu, A., & Lyons, K. (2024). The governance of artificial intelligence in Canada: Findings and opportunities from a review of 84 AI governance initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2024.101929

Barsekh-Onji, A., Torres Hernandez, Z., & Cardoso Espinosa, E. O. (2025). Advancing smart public administration: Challenges and benefits of artificial intelligence. Urban Governance, 5(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UGJ.2025.06.003

Calzada, I. (2025). Generative AI and the urban AI policy challenges ahead: Trustworthy for whom? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2025-0240

Cantero Gamito, M. (2023). The influence of China in AI governance through standardisation. Telecommunications Policy, 47(10), 102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2023.102673

Capón, P. R., Lombardero, J. A. A., & Verea, N. F. (2025). Gobernanza algorítmica local: diseño e implementación de un stack de IA soberana en código abierto para entidades supramunicipales. IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, (43), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7238/IDP.V0I43.9800300

CASP Checklists - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (s/f). Recuperado el 13 de mayo de 2026, de https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/

Cetina Presuel, R., & Martinez Sierra, J. M. (2024). The Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Bureaucratic Decision-making: A Weberian Perspective. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3609861

Couldry, Nick., & Mejias, U. Ali. (2019). The costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/sociology/costs-connection

Darmawati, D., Jaafar, N. I., HS, R., Baja, H. K., Purisamya, A. J., Yolanda, A. M. W., Amir, B., & Juanda, M. R. P. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving the Efficiency and Accuracy of Local Government Financial Reporting: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 2025, Vol. 18, Page 601, 18(11), 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/JRFM18110601

de Bruijn, H., Warnier, M., & Janssen, M. (2022). The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI: Strategies for explaining algorithmic decision-making. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2021.101666

Elbehairy, F., Mora, L., & Soe, R. M. (2025). Who are you? Examining the multifaceted innovation roles of municipal governments in AI governance. Technovation, 147, 103303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2025.103303

Fang, X., Zhou, H., & Chen, S. (2025). A Replication of “Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision-Making”. Public Administration, 103(4), 1232–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/PADM.70015

Filgueiras, F. (2021a). Inteligencia Artificial en la administración pública: ambigüedad y elección de sistemas de IA y desafíos de gobernanza digital. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, (79), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.69733/CLAD.RYD.N79.A221

Filgueiras, F. (2021b). New Pythias of public administration: ambiguity and choice in AI systems as challenges for governance. AI & SOCIETY 2021 37:4, 37(4), 1473–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00146-021-01201-4

Forgione, I. (2024). The perspective of artificial intelligence in administrative procedures and activities. Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto, 6(2), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0172

Fountain, J. E. (2022). The moon, the ghetto and artificial intelligence: Reducing systemic racism in computational algorithms. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101645. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2021.101645

Gunawan, H., Alfitri, Lionardo, A., Thamrin, M. H., & Perdana, D. A. (2025). Mapping the Intellectual Landscape of Digital Governance: Trends, Thematic Development, and Global Research Networks. Architecture Image Studies, 6(3), 1258–1270. https://doi.org/10.62754/AIS.V6I3.441

Henman, P. (2020). Improving public services using artificial intelligence: possibilities, pitfalls, governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1816188

Hickok, M. (2022). Public procurement of artificial intelligence systems: new risks and future proofing. AI & SOCIETY 2022 39:3, 39(3), 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00146-022-01572-2

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Joamets, K. (2025). Towards fair AI in Estonia’s public service: discussing and disseminating bias prevention in automated decision-making. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 15(3), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.2478/BJES-2025-0037

Juárez-Merino, M. Á. (2025). Artificial intelligence and citizenship in Latin American governments. Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления, 5(5), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2025-0-5-71-86

Khisro, J. (2025). Towards Advancing AI Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management: US Government Agencies’ Reflections. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/PRA2.1260

Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215012

Küsters, A. (2025). Future-proofing the EU: ordoliberal governance and algorithmic regulation. Constitutional Political Economy 2025 36:4, 36(4), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10602-025-09467-2

Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2020.101976

Kwilinski, A., & Reznik, O. (2025). Governance of Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Systems in the EU and Ukraine: Legal Foundations and Institutional Mechanisms. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 13(3), 8-52–58–52. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO3_1

Langer, C. (2024). Decision-making power and responsibility in an automated administration. Discover Artificial Intelligence 2024 4:1, 4(1), 59-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S44163-024-00152-1

Long, Y., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2023). Understanding the Extent of Automation and Process Transparency Appropriate for Public Services: AI in Chinese Local Governments. 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.322550

Lozano-Paredes, L. (2025). Mapping AI’s role in NSW governance: a socio-technical analysis of GenAI integration. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1595345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1595345

Maria, E., & Halim, A. (2026). Institutional readiness and resistance to AI-based accounting platforms: evidence from Indonesian local governments. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 20(2), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2025-0176

Nalbandian, L. (2022). Increasing the accountability of automated decision-making systems: An assessment of the automated decision-making system introduced in Canada’s temporary resident visa immigration stream. Journal of Responsible Technology, 10, 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRT.2021.100023

Nitzberg, M., & Zysman, J. (2022). Algorithms, data, and platforms: the diverse challenges of governing AI. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(11), 1753–1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2096668

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71

Papageorgiou, G., Sarlis, V., Maragoudakis, M., & Tjortjis, C. (2024). Enhancing E-Government Services through State-of-the-Art, Modular, and Reproducible Architecture over Large Language Models. Applied Sciences 2024, Vol. 14, Page 8259, 14(18), 8259. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP14188259

Prieto, E. A. C., Galarza, I. A. S., Guevara, A. P., Sanchez, S. P. V., & Calderón, R. F. C. (2024). Governance Model for Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector of Guayaquil, Ecuador, 2024. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 12850-12859–12850 – 12859. https://doi.org/10.62754/JOE.V3I8.6113

Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., Blunt, H., Brigham, T., Chang, S., Clark, J., Conway, A., Couban, R., de Kock, S., Farrah, K., Fehrmann, P., Foster, M., Fowler, S. A., Glanville, J., … Young, S. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews 2021 10:1, 10(1), 39-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-020-01542-Z

Robles, P., & Mallinson, D. J. (2023). Catching up with AI: Pushing toward a cohesive governance framework. Politics & Policy, 51(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/POLP.12529

Robles, P., & Mallinson, D. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence technology, public trust, and effective governance. Review of Policy Research, 42(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ROPR.12555

Sergei, K., Alexander, K., Polina, E., & Nikita, A. (2022). Factoring ethics in management algorithms for municipal information-analytical systems. AI and Ethics 2021 2:1, 2(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43681-021-00098-5

Sigfrids, A., Nieminen, M., Leikas, J., & Pikkuaho, P. (2022). How Should Public Administrations Foster the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence? A Review of Proposals for Developing Governance of AI. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 4, 858108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2022.858108

Khammassi, S., & AlShanqityi, Y. (2025). Digital Rights, AI, and the Law: International Perspectives on Saudi Arabia’s Legal Framework and International Experience. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, (Special), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-8.S-a000154

Suat, A. (2025). Rethinking AI: Power, Surveillance, and Democracy. Journal of Economic Sociology, 26(5), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2025-5-138-155

Syafhendry, S., Ganaie, N. A., & Yama, A. (2025). Smart elections or rigged algorithms: the rise of artificial intelligence in electoral governance in Southeast Asia. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1672310. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPOS.2025.1672310

Vatamanu, A. F., & Tofan, M. (2025). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Public Administration: Challenges and Vulnerabilities. Administrative Sciences 2025, Vol. 15, Page 149, 15(4), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ADMSCI15040149

Vesolovska, M., Karkovska, V., & Duma, O. (2025). Artificial intelligence in public administration: how the emotional intelligence of civil servants influences its effective implementation. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2025.45-02

Wang, Y. F., Chen, Y. C., & Chien, S. Y. (2025). Citizens’ intention to follow recommendations from a government-supported AI-enabled system. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 372–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231176126

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. En Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wilson, C., & van der Velden, M. (2022). Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making. Technology in Society, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101926

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Sturm, B. J. (2020). The Dark Sides of Artificial Intelligence: An Integrated AI Governance Framework for Public Administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(9), 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1749851

Xu, J. (2024). Opening the ‘black box’ of algorithms: regulation of algorithms in China. Communication Research and Practice, 10(3), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2024.2346415

Yuan, Q., & Chen, T. (2025). Holding AI-Based Systems Accountable in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review. Public Performance & Management Review, 48(6), 1389–1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2469784

Zhao, X., Huo, Y., Abedin, M. Z., Shang, Y., & Alofaysan, H. (2025). Intelligent government: The impact and mechanism of government transparency driven by AI. Public Money & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2025.2500093

Published

2026-06-24

Issue

Section

Communication of Science: Bibliometrics and systematic reviews.

How to Cite

Alfaro-Chirinos, L. M. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and digital governance in public administration: systematic review. InveCom Journal, 6(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20835763