Implications of Blended learning for university students: A systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15757969

Keywords:

blended learning, strategies, autonomy

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the implications of blended learning for university students. To this end, a systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA method. The inclusion criteria included the keywords in English and Spanish: “blended learning” AND “students.” The Scopus and SciELO databases were consulted, considering only open-access articles in both languages published between 2020 and 2025. Restricted access or paid articles were excluded. The search yielded a total of 380 articles in Scopus and 119 in SciELO; after applying the selection criteria, 10 articles from Scopus and 11 from SciELO were analyzed, for a total of 21 studies. The analysis concludes that the success of online learning is closely linked to principles of social justice, highlighting the relevance of blended learning as an inclusive and adaptable alternative in the current educational context. This modality promotes learning experiences characterized by active participation, collaboration between teachers and students, and the strengthening of autonomy in learning. It also facilitates adaptation, reinforces self-efficacy, and encourages more disciplined study habits. Strategies such as ideolecciones with lightboards, integrated into a blended model, showed significant improvements in academic performance and promoted individualized learning trajectories. The importance of the quality of digital materials and the student's ability to manage their autonomous learning is also highlighted. Finally, educational technologies such as HyFlex, Zoom, and Canvas were positively evaluated, especially when implemented with constructivist approaches aimed at enhancing active learning and a visual theoretical model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, I., Syed, Zarina, L., Khanya, M., Zintle, M., Pama, B. & Somdaka, B. (2024). An exploration of undergraduate health science students' experiences of blended learning andragogy: A rapid review. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2024/vol54no3a7

Ali, K., Alhaija, E., Raja, M., Zahra, D., Brookes, Z., McColl, E., & Daher, H. (2023). Blended learning in undergraduate dental education: a global pilot study. Medical Education Online, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2171700

Alzer, H., Ismail, N. H., & Alsoleihat, F. (2023). Blended Learning with Video Demonstrations Enhances Dental Students’ Achievements in Tooth Carving. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 14, 1425–1431. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S426199

Almohammadi, N., Elnugomi, N., Atta, A. & Zalat, M. (2025). Perspectives of Medical Students in Using Blended Learning: A Thematic Analysis. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 16, 837–847. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S515941

Blanco-García, L., Blanco-Muñoz, S., Vicuña-Huaqui, L., López, A. & Oseda-Gago, Du. (2022). Herramientas digitales en el proceso de aprendizaje semipresencial en la Educación Dental Peruana durante la Pandemia COVID-19. Revista Estomatológica Herediana, 32(3), 319-328. Epub 27 de septiembre de 2022. https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v32i3.4291

Brown, M., Skerritt, C., Shevlin, P., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2022). Deconstructing the challenges and opportunities for blended learning in the post emergency learning era. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022526

Castro-Terán, J. (2024). Medición de la apropiación de logros de aprehendizaje en física en modalidades virtual y semipresencial. Revista Cátedra, 7(2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.29166/catedra.v7i2.5216

Elizondo-Mejías, J., López-Estrada, P., & Pérez-Hidalgo, E. (2025). Opiniones de los profesores sobre la aplicación de la educación combinada durante la pandemia en Costa Rica. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 27(42), 206-218. https://dx.doi.org/10.22458/ie.v27i42.5206

Ezeiza, A. (2023). Retomar el foro virtual como contexto sociodiscursivo para el desarrollo de la escritura académica universitaria. Perspectiva Educacional, 62(2), 140-164. https://dx.doi.org/10.4151/07189729-vol.62-iss.2-art.1407

Fenech, R. (2021). Blended learning: Honouring students’ Psychological Contract. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1914286

Govender, S., Kyarkanaye, T. & Eslick, C. (2024). The perceptions of speech-language pathology and audiology students towards online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: considerations for the future professoriate. South African Journal of Higher Education, 38(5), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-5-6412

Hill, J., & Smith, K. (2023). Visions of blended learning: identifying the challenges and opportunities in shaping institutional approaches to blended learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2176916

Nghitanwa, E., Haipinge, E. & Josua, L. (2025). Nursing students' access to technological devices in nursing education: A quantitative study in Namibia. Curationis, 48(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2626

Núñez-Rojas, N., Meoño-Ballena, J., Valdivieso-López, E. J., & Canchumanya, D. (2024). Percepciones sobre la aplicación de las Aulas Hyflex, Zoom y Canvas: aportes par-24a el modelo formativo onlife. Formación universitaria, 17(2), 35-46. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062024000200035

Papageorgiou, E., van der Merwe, N., Terblanche, W., & Lubbe, I. (2024). Perceptions of using e-learning applications in accounting at residential universities in South Africa: a social justice lens. South African Journal of Higher Education, 38(6), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-6-5912

Pei, L., Poortman, C., Schildkamp, K., & Benes, N. (2025). Professional development for promoting a sense of community in blended learning. Professional Development in Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2446576

Ramírez-Sosa, M. & Peña-Estrada, C. (2022). B-learning para Mejorar el Proceso de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 15(2), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v15i2.309

Rocha-Gómez, M., Quiroga-García, M., Gloria-Garza, M., Espinosa-Rivera, M., Cruz-Palma, G. & Rangel-Padilla, E. (2024). Aprendizaje Combinado: ¿Una Alternativa en Odontología?. International journal of odontostomatology, 18(4), 450-456. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-381X2024000400450

Russo, A., Warren, L., Neri, L., Herdan, A., & Brickman, K. (2021). Enhancing accounting and finance students’ awareness of transferable skills in an integrated blended learning environment. Accounting Education, 31(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1961087

Salas Rueda, R. (2023). Metodología de diseño sobre las aplicaciones web educativas para el campo de las matemáticas. Revista gestión de las personas y tecnología, 16(48), 138-157. https://dx.doi.org/10.35588/gpt.v16i48.6506

Sanusi, M. S. (2022). Action research to reassess the acceptance and use of technology in a blended learning approach amongst postgraduate business students. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2145813

Sarkar, S., Sharma, S., & Raheja, S. (2021). Implementation of Blended Learning Approach for Improving Anatomy Lectures of Phase I MBBS Students – Learner Satisfaction Survey. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 413–420. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S301634

Soncco, R. (2022). Aprendizaje móvil y las competencias del idioma inglés en la educación superior. Comuni@cción, 13(2), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.13.2.571

Valentieva, T., Pak, A., Lebid, O., Volkova, N., & Karpova, M. (2024). The use of innovative technologies for teaching the humanities. Conrado, 20(99), 99-107. Epub 30 de julio de 2024. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1990-86442024000400099&lng=es&tlng=en

Winfield, J., & Whitelaw, E.. (2024). Blended, flipped and lit: student perceptions and performance under blended learning with a flipped classroom and a lightboard. South African Journal of Higher Education, 38(6), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-6-5970

Yesmakhanova, Zharkynay, N., Yerepbayev, B., Aktolkyn, M., Alimbayev, G. & Omarov, N. (2024). Evaluation of students' attitudes towards blended learning. South African Journal of Education, 44(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v44n4a2541

Published

2025-06-27

Issue

Section

Communication of Science: Bibliometrics and systematic reviews.

How to Cite

Rueda Chavez , F. E., & Peña Vargas , R. Y. (2025). Implications of Blended learning for university students: A systematic review . InveCom Journal, 6(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15757969

Most read articles by the same author(s)